United States v. Mentzer — 10th Cir. (Sep 16, 2026)
Bruce Mentzer's federal case arose from stalking conduct involving a gun. He pleaded guilty to a firearm count with a five-year guideline sentence, but the judge imposed thirty years. Ann Taliaferro of Brown, Bradshaw & Moffat will argue for Mentzer that the judge did not give enough notice or explain the much longer term. A departure uses a specific Guidelines provision to move outside the range; a variance relies on broader statutory sentencing factors. Rule 32(h) requires notice of some departures, so which route the judge took matters. Mentzer also argues that the judge failed to weigh his acceptance of responsibility and other mitigating evidence.
United States v. Mentzer (No. 25-3132) — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit, argued September 16, 2026.
- 0:00Introduction
- 16:33Advocate — Duston Slinkard