⚖ Oral Arguments, with Context

Real court arguments, crisp audio, with context.

Court recordings can be difficult to follow, and many suffer from poor audio quality. This podcast enhances the audio, provides a brief introduction to each case, and explains legal concepts that may be unfamiliar to some listeners.

We hope these enhancements make oral argument recordings easier to understand, more accessible, and more enjoyable to listen to.

Apple Podcasts Spotify YouTube /feed.xml Open RSS

Mostafa v. Blanche — 10th Cir. (Sep 15, 2026)

No. 25-1454 Argued September 15, 2026 Published September 27, 2026

The Tenth Circuit hears Mostafa Kamel Mostafa's appeal over medical care at the federal ADX prison in Colorado. Mostafa's arms were amputated below the elbows. He says inadequate prosthetics and inconsistent help with meals and hygiene leave him struggling with basic daily tasks. The district court dismissed his Eighth Amendment claim for damages against individual officials. His lawyer will seek a hearing on needed accommodations and argue that Bivens permits money damages. Bivens is a narrow, judge-recognized route to damages for constitutional violations by federal officers. The government will argue that Tenth Circuit precedent blocks that route, and that his Administrative Procedure Act theory identifies no reviewable final agency action. The judges also consider waiting for a related Supreme Court case, Nielsen v. Watanabe, set for argument in November.

Mostafa v. Blanche (No. 25-1454) — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit, argued September 15, 2026.

0:00
0:00