⚖ Oral Arguments, with Context

Real court arguments, crisp audio, with context.

Court recordings can be difficult to follow, and many suffer from poor audio quality. This podcast enhances the audio, provides a brief introduction to each case, and explains legal concepts that may be unfamiliar to some listeners.

We hope these enhancements make oral argument recordings easier to understand, more accessible, and more enjoyable to listen to.

Apple Podcasts Spotify YouTube /feed.xml Open RSS Status

United States v. Withrow — 10th Cir. (Sep 15, 2026)

No. 24-5040 Argued September 15, 2026 Published October 8, 2026

The Tenth Circuit hears United States versus Withrow. A jury convicted Withrow of murdering Dustin Tucker. Prosecutors described the shooting as retaliation for informing on others, and said Withrow later told other people he had killed Tucker. Withrow appealed. Before trial, a witness had developed severe memory loss; the defense challenged using her earlier statements. You'll hear Massiah, a Supreme Court decision about the Sixth Amendment right to a lawyer. After formal charges, government agents generally cannot deliberately elicit incriminating statements about the charged offense without counsel. That protection also covers covert questioning by someone acting as a government agent.

United States v. Withrow (No. 24-5040) — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit, argued September 15, 2026.

Sources
Witness-memory issue before trial — district court opinion (Jul14,2023):https://app.midpage.ai/document/united-states-v-withrow-1000365553035
Notice of appeal — public copy of clerk docket entries (2024 snapshot):https://dockets.justia.com/docket/circuit-courts/ca10/24-5040
Right to counsel — Massiah v. United States, Supreme Court opinion:https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/377/201/
Undercover informants — United States v. Henry, Supreme Court opinion:https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/447/264/

0:00
0:00