⚖ Oral Arguments, with Context

Real court arguments, crisp audio, with context.

Court recordings can be difficult to follow, and many suffer from poor audio quality. This podcast enhances the audio, provides a brief introduction to each case, and explains legal concepts that may be unfamiliar to some listeners.

We hope these enhancements make oral argument recordings easier to understand, more accessible, and more enjoyable to listen to.

Apple Podcasts Spotify YouTube /feed.xml Open RSS

Molina-Diaz v. Blanche — 1st Cir. (argued September 9, 2026)

No. 25-2091 Argued September 9, 2026 Published September 9, 2026

The First Circuit hears Molina-Diaz v. Blanche, a petition for review in an immigration case. Molina-Diaz relies on Rivera-Medrano v. Garland to contend that individualized PTSD evidence changes how the agency should assess inconsistencies behind an adverse-credibility finding.

Molina-Diaz v. Blanche (No. 25-2091) — U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit, argued September 9, 2026.

Sources
Argument audio — U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit (public domain, 17 U.S.C. § 105):https://www.ca1.uscourts.gov/sites/ca1/files/oralargs/25-2091_20260909.mp3
Argument listing — U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit:https://www.ca1.uscourts.gov/doar/results/2026-09

0:00
0:00