Oral Arguments, with Context

Real court arguments, crisp audio, with context.

Court recordings can be difficult to follow, and many suffer from poor audio quality. This podcast enhances the audio, provides a brief introduction to each case, and explains legal concepts that may be unfamiliar to some listeners.

We hope these enhancements make oral argument recordings easier to understand, more accessible, and more enjoyable to listen to.

Apple Podcasts Spotify YouTube /feed.xml Open RSS

Standing Trees, Inc. v. U.S. Forest Service — 1st Cir. (argued September 9, 2026)

No. 25-2086 Argued September 9, 2026 Published September 10, 2026

The First Circuit considers a challenge to two timber projects in New Hampshire's White Mountain National Forest. Standing Trees appeals a judgment upholding the Forest Service's approvals. It argues that the agency did not show compliance with the forest plan and failed to consider alternatives and the projects' combined effects. The Forest Service disputes those claims and says some were not preserved below.

Standing Trees, Inc. v. U.S. Forest Service (No. 25-2086) — U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit, argued September 9, 2026.

Sources
Argument audio — U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit (public domain, 17 U.S.C. § 105):https://www.ca1.uscourts.gov/sites/ca1/files/oralargs/25-2086_20260909.mp3
Recording listing — U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit:https://www.ca1.uscourts.gov/doar/results/2026-09
Argument calendar — U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit:https://www.ca1.uscourts.gov/sites/ca1/files/calendar.pdf?simple=True
District court opinion — U.S. District Court for the District of New Hampshire:https://www.nhd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/Opinions/2024/25NH099.pdf
Christophe Courchesne profile — Vermont Law and Graduate School:https://www.vermontlaw.edu/faculty/courchesne-christophe
Chenery rule — U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit:https://www.ca1.uscourts.gov/sites/ca1/files/opnfiles/04-1145-01A.pdf
SEC v. Chenery Corp. — Cornell Legal Information Institute:https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/332/194

0:00
0:00