Oral Arguments, with Context

Real court arguments, crisp audio, with context.

Court recordings can be difficult to follow, and many suffer from poor audio quality. This podcast enhances the audio, provides a brief introduction to each case, and explains legal concepts that may be unfamiliar to some listeners.

We hope these enhancements make oral argument recordings easier to understand, more accessible, and more enjoyable to listen to.

Apple Podcasts Spotify YouTube /feed.xml Open RSS

Noem v. Al Otro Lado — SCOTUS (argued March 24, 2026)

No. 25-5 Argued March 24, 2026 Published July 22, 2026; updated August 19, 2026

The Supreme Court considers whether asylum seekers stopped just outside the U.S.-Mexico border have arrived in the United States under federal immigration law. Under a practice called metering, border officers turned people away from ports of entry before they crossed the boundary. Al Otro Lado says federal law requires inspection and asylum processing at the threshold; the government says those duties begin only after entry. The Court later ruled six to three for the government: a person standing in Mexico has not arrived in the United States.

Noem v. Al Otro Lado (No. 25-5) — Supreme Court of the United States, argued March 24, 2026.

0:00
0:00