Oral Arguments, with Context

Real court arguments, crisp audio, with context.

Court recordings can be difficult to follow, and many suffer from poor audio quality. This podcast enhances the audio, provides a brief introduction to each case, and explains legal concepts that may be unfamiliar to some listeners.

We hope these enhancements make oral argument recordings easier to understand, more accessible, and more enjoyable to listen to.

Apple Podcasts Spotify YouTube /feed.xml Open RSS

T.M. v. University of Maryland Medical System Corporation — SCOTUS (argued April 20, 2026)

No. 25-197 Argued April 20, 2026 Published July 13, 2026; updated August 19, 2026

The Supreme Court considers whether the Rooker-Feldman doctrine applies before state appeals are over. The doctrine prevents federal trial courts from acting as appellate courts over state judgments. T.M. challenged a Maryland consent order that conditioned her release from involuntary psychiatric care, while her state appeal remained pending. She then asked a federal court to declare the order unconstitutional and void. The Court later affirmed, holding five to four that Rooker-Feldman also applies to state judgments still subject to appeal.

T.M. v. University of Maryland Medical System Corporation (No. 25-197) — Supreme Court of the United States, argued April 20, 2026.

0:00
0:00