Oral Arguments, with Context

Real court arguments, crisp audio, with context.

Court recordings can be difficult to follow, and many suffer from poor audio quality. This podcast enhances the audio, provides a brief introduction to each case, and explains legal concepts that may be unfamiliar to some listeners.

We hope these enhancements make oral argument recordings easier to understand, more accessible, and more enjoyable to listen to.

Apple Podcasts Spotify YouTube /feed.xml Open RSS

Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Corporación Cimex, S.A. — SCOTUS (argued February 23, 2026)

No. 24-699 Argued February 23, 2026 Published August 16, 2026; updated August 18, 2026

The Supreme Court considers whether Exxon can sue Cuban state-owned companies over oil assets Cuba confiscated in 1960. The Helms-Burton Act lets a United States claimant sue for trafficking in confiscated property, a term that includes knowingly using or benefiting from it. The Act defines a person to include a foreign state's agencies and instrumentalities. Sovereign immunity ordinarily shields those entities from lawsuits. Abrogating that immunity means Congress removes it by statute. Exxon says Helms-Burton does that on its own. The Cuban companies say Exxon must also satisfy an exception in the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act. The D.C. Circuit agreed with the companies. The Supreme Court later reversed, six to three, holding that Helms-Burton itself removes the immunity of Cuban agencies and instrumentalities.

Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Corporación Cimex, S.A. (No. 24-699) — Supreme Court of the United States, argued February 23, 2026.

Sources
Argument audio — Supreme Court of the United States:https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/audio/2025/24-699
Argument transcript — Supreme Court of the United States:https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2025/24-699_6khn.pdf
Case docket and counsel record — Supreme Court of the United States:https://www.supremecourt.gov/docket/docketfiles/html/public/24-699.html
Opinion and judgment — Supreme Court of the United States:https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/24-699_f204.pdf
Opinion below — U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit:https://media.cadc.uscourts.gov/opinions/docs/2024/07/21-7127-2067294.pdf
Foreign-state jurisdictional immunity — 28 U.S.C. § 1604:https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=%28title%3A28+section%3A1604+edition%3Aprelim%29
Department of Agriculture Rural Development v. Kirtz — Supreme Court opinion:https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/22-846_2co3.pdf

0:00
0:00