Oral Arguments, with Context

Real court arguments, crisp audio, with context.

Court recordings can be difficult to follow, and many suffer from poor audio quality. This podcast enhances the audio, provides a brief introduction to each case, and explains legal concepts that may be unfamiliar to some listeners.

We hope these enhancements make oral argument recordings easier to understand, more accessible, and more enjoyable to listen to.

Apple Podcasts Spotify YouTube /feed.xml Open RSS

Fischer v. United States — SCOTUS (argued April 16, 2024)

No. 23-5572 Argued April 16, 2024 Published July 4, 2026; updated August 16, 2026

The Supreme Court interprets a federal obstruction law used against some January 6 defendants. Section 1512(c)(1) prohibits corruptly destroying or altering evidence for an official proceeding. The next clause punishes anyone who otherwise corruptly obstructs the proceeding. Joseph Fischer says otherwise limits that clause to comparable evidence-related conduct. The United States says it covers every other form of obstruction, including forcing Congress to halt the electoral-vote count. The D.C. Circuit agreed with the government. The Supreme Court later vacated that judgment, six to three, holding that the second clause requires impairing records, documents, objects, or other things used in the proceeding.

Fischer v. United States (No. 23-5572) — Supreme Court of the United States, argued April 16, 2024.

0:00
0:00